Asus Vivobook 17X review a large screen for cheap Digital Trends
Asus Vivobook 17X review: a large screen for cheap Digital Trends Skip to main content Trending: Wordle Today October 24 Dell XPS 15 vs. Razer Blade 15 Best Dolby Atmos Soundbars iPhone 14 Plus Review Halo Rise vs. Nest Hub 2nd Gen HP Envy x360 13 (2022) Review Best Chromebook Printers Home ComputingReviews Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?
Intel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i7-12700H Graphics Intel Iris Xe RAM 8GB DDR4
12GB DDR4
16GB DDR4 Display 17.3-inch 16:9 Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS Storage 256GB PCIe 3.0 SSD
512GB PCIe 3.0 SSD
1TB PCIe 3.0 SSD Touch No Ports 1 x USB-A 2.0
2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1
1 x HDMI 1.4
1 x 3.5mm audio jack Wireless Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5 Webcam 720p Operating system Windows 11 Battery 50 watt-hours Price $630+ The Vivobook 17X starts at $630 for a Core i3-1220P CPU, 8GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. At the high end is my $999 review unit, equipped with a Core i7-12700H CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD. All models come with a 17.3-inc,h 16:9 Full HD (1920 x 1200) IPS display. The most attractive configuration, though, is the $730 version with a Core i5-12500H, 12GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. I didn’t test this configuration, but it’s a decent value on paper.
(nits) Contrast sRGB gamut AdobeRGB gamut Accuracy DeltaE
(lower is better) Asus Vivobook 17X
(IPS) 278 660:1 65% 48% 3.39 Asus Vivobook S 14 Flip
(IPS) 321 1,230:1 64% 48% 3.14 Acer Swift 3 2022
(IPS) 368 1,330:1 98% 75% 1.51 HP Envy 16
(OLED) 348 24,3010:1 100% 97% 0.74 The audio quality matched the display. Yes, the dual speakers were plenty loud, but the highs were grating and overpowered the mids and lows. There was also considerable distortion at full volume. You’ll want headphones or Bluetooth speakers for anything other than system sounds.
(single / multi) Handbrake
(seconds) Cinebench R23
(single / multi) PCMark 10
Complete Asus Vivobook 17X
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,698 / 8,339
Perf: 1,714 / 8,558 Bal: 93
Perf: 87 Bal: 1,681 / 11,083
Perf: 1,717 / 12,552 5,665 HP Envy 16
(Core i9-12900H) Bal: 1,839 / 11,187
Perf: 1,811 / 11,387 Bal: 83
Perf: 84 Bal: 1,919 / 12,538
Perf: 1922 / 12,525 6,872 Lenovo ThinkPad Z16
(Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H) Bal: 1,360 / 8,648
Perf: 1,365 / 8,679 Bal: 88
Perf: 87 Bal: 1,376 / 10,938
Perf: 1,374 / 11,553 6,260 Dell XPS 15 9520
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,470 / 9,952
Perf: 1,714 / 11,053 Bal: 100
Perf: 77 Bal: 1,509 / 11,578
Perf: 1,806 / 13,313 5,559 Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,829 / 10,819
Perf: N/A Bal: 94
Perf: 82 Bal: 1,793 / 12,046
Perf: N/A 6,242 LG Gram 16 2-in-1
(Core i7-1260P) Bal: 1,682 / 9,035
Perf: 1,686 / 9,479 Bal: 137
Perf: 113 Bal: 1,524 / 6,314
Perf: 1,663 / 8,396 5,404 Mark Coppock/Digital Trends The Vivobook 17X was equipped with a 50-watt-hour battery, which is small for a fast CPU and 17-inch display, even in Full HD. As such, its battery life was below average across the board, hitting just five hours in our web browsing test, 10 hours in our video test (which isn’t terrible), and less than seven hours in the PCMark 10 Applications battery test. Overall, the results don’t bode well for all-day battery life. The power brick isn’t huge, though, so carrying it around shouldn’t be a huge burden.
Asus Vivobook 17X review a large screen for cheap
By Mark Coppock October 19, 2022 Share Asus Vivobook 17X MSRP $1,000.00 Score Details "The Asus Vivobook 17X's poor display spoils what would be a solid budget 17-inch laptop." Pros Solid productivity performance Good keyboard Attractive price Reasonable weight Cons Poor display Flimsy build quality The touchpad could be bigger The largest mainstream machines available today, 17-inch laptops, offer the most screen real estate for multitasking and creative work. They also come with larger chassis. But they’re not all built the same, with some aiming at budget prices and productivity performance and others packing in the fastest components and best displays aimed at creators. Contents Asus Vivobook 17X specsThe muted displayLook elsewhere for discrete graphicsWhat a budget machine buys youGlaring weaknesses but the price matters The Asus Vivobook 17X belongs in the former group. It offers a low price starting at $630 while maxing out at $1,000, with fast 45-watt Intel 12th-gen CPUs available. But it’s limited to integrated Intel graphics, meaning it won’t churn through GPU-dependent creative apps or hit high frame rates while gaming. The Vivobook 17X is an intriguing option when configured for around $700, but the build quality, display, and battery life make it hard to recommend at a higher price.Asus Vivobook 17X specs
Asus Vivobook 17X Dimensions 15.72 inches x 10.01 inches x 0.78 inches Weight 4.63 pounds Processor Intel Core i3-1220PIntel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i7-12700H Graphics Intel Iris Xe RAM 8GB DDR4
12GB DDR4
16GB DDR4 Display 17.3-inch 16:9 Full HD (1920 x 1080) IPS Storage 256GB PCIe 3.0 SSD
512GB PCIe 3.0 SSD
1TB PCIe 3.0 SSD Touch No Ports 1 x USB-A 2.0
2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1
1 x HDMI 1.4
1 x 3.5mm audio jack Wireless Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5 Webcam 720p Operating system Windows 11 Battery 50 watt-hours Price $630+ The Vivobook 17X starts at $630 for a Core i3-1220P CPU, 8GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. At the high end is my $999 review unit, equipped with a Core i7-12700H CPU, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD. All models come with a 17.3-inc,h 16:9 Full HD (1920 x 1200) IPS display. The most attractive configuration, though, is the $730 version with a Core i5-12500H, 12GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. I didn’t test this configuration, but it’s a decent value on paper.
The muted display
When you’re buying a 17-inch laptop, the standout feature is the display. It’s the whole point of buying such a large machine, and its quality has an oversized impact on the computing experience. Unfortunately, the Vivobook 17X display is well below average, certainly compared to midrange and premium laptops and even according to many budget machines we’ve reviewed in the last year or so. The Asus is the least expensive 17-inch laptop we’ve tested in some time, but even without direct comparisons, I’m comfortable saying this is quite a poor display for this price. This was obvious when I turned it on. It wasn’t very bright, and its colors were muted. The contrast also seemed low. Even judging it from the perspective of productivity work, I wasn’t impressed. It’s also an old-school 16:9 IPS display running at a mere Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution. That’s not very sharp, with noticeable pixelation in text that’s made even less attractive thanks to the low contrast. And this display won’t even come close to meeting the needs of even entry-level creators. As I noted, we haven’t reviewed any other 17-inch budget laptops recently, but we can compare the display to those on some other reasonably priced laptops. Simply put, the Vivobook 17X display is the worst display we’ve seen in a while. It doesn’t hit our 300-nit brightness threshold, its 660:1 contrast ratio results in greys rather than blacks, and its colors are narrow and inaccurate. The HP Envy 16 with the same CPU, RAM, and storage but with a much faster Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 GPU and a spectacular higher-resolution OLED display is just $1,400 right now. Yes, that’s more money than my review unit, but it’s also a much faster machine with a display that’s in another league entirely. Brightness(nits) Contrast sRGB gamut AdobeRGB gamut Accuracy DeltaE
(lower is better) Asus Vivobook 17X
(IPS) 278 660:1 65% 48% 3.39 Asus Vivobook S 14 Flip
(IPS) 321 1,230:1 64% 48% 3.14 Acer Swift 3 2022
(IPS) 368 1,330:1 98% 75% 1.51 HP Envy 16
(OLED) 348 24,3010:1 100% 97% 0.74 The audio quality matched the display. Yes, the dual speakers were plenty loud, but the highs were grating and overpowered the mids and lows. There was also considerable distortion at full volume. You’ll want headphones or Bluetooth speakers for anything other than system sounds.
Look elsewhere for discrete graphics
Several manufacturers have been installing 45-watt Intel 12th-gen CPUs along with integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics, especially in 14-inch laptops. That’s a switch from the past where faster, more power-hungry CPUs were more typically installed with discrete GPUs for maximum performance. In a 17-inch machine like the Vivobook 17X, it’s a strange combination but still promises superior performance. As it turns out, the Vivobook 17X did indeed provide excellent performance, especially for productivity workflows and less demanding creative tasks. It did well in CPU-intensive processes like our Handbrake test that encodes a 420MB video as H.265 and in Cinebench R23. If your creative work doesn’t involve applications that utilize the GPU to speed things up, then you’ll be happy with the laptop’s performance. Of course, the Vivobook 17X display isn’t well-suited for creative applications. If you use applications that can use the GPU, though, like Adobe’s Creative Suite, then you’ll want to spend more money to match performance with display size. I provide both balanced and performance results using the Asus thermal management utility in the table below, but the settings made little difference. Of course, the Vivobook 17X display isn’t well-suited for creative tasks, in any event, so looking at the laptop as a multitasking productivity workstation is the best bet. If you’re on the strictest budget, then the laptop can also handle some less demanding creative workflows. Given the integrated graphics, gaming will be limited to older games and esports titles and low resolutions with reduced graphical detail. Geekbench(single / multi) Handbrake
(seconds) Cinebench R23
(single / multi) PCMark 10
Complete Asus Vivobook 17X
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,698 / 8,339
Perf: 1,714 / 8,558 Bal: 93
Perf: 87 Bal: 1,681 / 11,083
Perf: 1,717 / 12,552 5,665 HP Envy 16
(Core i9-12900H) Bal: 1,839 / 11,187
Perf: 1,811 / 11,387 Bal: 83
Perf: 84 Bal: 1,919 / 12,538
Perf: 1922 / 12,525 6,872 Lenovo ThinkPad Z16
(Ryzen 7 Pro 6850H) Bal: 1,360 / 8,648
Perf: 1,365 / 8,679 Bal: 88
Perf: 87 Bal: 1,376 / 10,938
Perf: 1,374 / 11,553 6,260 Dell XPS 15 9520
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,470 / 9,952
Perf: 1,714 / 11,053 Bal: 100
Perf: 77 Bal: 1,509 / 11,578
Perf: 1,806 / 13,313 5,559 Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo
(Core i7-12700H) Bal: 1,829 / 10,819
Perf: N/A Bal: 94
Perf: 82 Bal: 1,793 / 12,046
Perf: N/A 6,242 LG Gram 16 2-in-1
(Core i7-1260P) Bal: 1,682 / 9,035
Perf: 1,686 / 9,479 Bal: 137
Perf: 113 Bal: 1,524 / 6,314
Perf: 1,663 / 8,396 5,404 Mark Coppock/Digital Trends The Vivobook 17X was equipped with a 50-watt-hour battery, which is small for a fast CPU and 17-inch display, even in Full HD. As such, its battery life was below average across the board, hitting just five hours in our web browsing test, 10 hours in our video test (which isn’t terrible), and less than seven hours in the PCMark 10 Applications battery test. Overall, the results don’t bode well for all-day battery life. The power brick isn’t huge, though, so carrying it around shouldn’t be a huge burden.