Justice Sotomayor Praises Clarence Thomas ' He Cares About People' HEAD TOPICS

Justice Sotomayor Praises Clarence Thomas ' He Cares About People'

10/23/2022 12:35:00 AM

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor one of the Court' s strident liberals praised her conservative colleague Justice Clarence Thomas

Source

Breitbart News

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the Court’s most strident liberals, praised her conservative colleague, Justice Clarence Thomas, noting his unique compassion for others. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the Court's strident liberals, praised her conservative colleague, Justice Clarence Thomas. 21 Oct 2022Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the Court’s most strident liberals, praised her conservative colleague, Justice Clarence Thomas, in a lecture at Roosevelt University in Chicago on Thursday evening, noting his unique compassion for others. Sotomayor wasquotedby CNN national political writer Eric Bradner as saying:I have disagreed with [Thomas] more than with any other justice. Which means we don’t come together on many cases. And yet I can tell you that I spend time with him, understanding that he is one of the few justices who knows practically everybody in our building. He knows their name, he knows the things about their life, what their family is suffering. He’ll tell me, you know that person’s wife is sick right now, or that person’s child is having difficulty. Read more:
Breitbart News » Justice Kagan: 'Time will tell' if Supreme Court can find 'common ground' Column: How Congress could rein in the rogue Supreme Court ACLU asks Supreme Court to invalidate laws banning anti-Israel boycotts Pivotal Illinois Supreme Court elections, fueled by Big Money, are on the docket

Hu Jintao escorted out of China party congress

Video footage showed a steward repeatedly trying to lift Hu from his seat, drawing concerned looks from nearby officials. Read more >> Justice Kagan: 'Time will tell' if Supreme Court can find 'common ground'Her comments come after a term in which six conservatives and three liberals were split on major issues including abortion. time's up the answer's no She could give following the Constitution a try... tends to help. Column: How Congress could rein in the rogue Supreme CourtAfter the Supreme Court lurched to the far right on abortion, gun control and other fronts, ideas for placing limits on its power are proliferating. The Supreme Court isn’t rogue. Ridiculous What rogue SCOTUS? Not my problem RBG didn't retire under Obama's 1st term when everyone told her to. She doubled down, bet all in, and lost it all by ending up dying under Trump. Her fault. the supreme court rules on cases in ways the times doesn't like, so the heavy fist of government is obviously needed to right that 'wrong'. i see which party is threatening democracy again? ACLU asks Supreme Court to invalidate laws banning anti-Israel boycottsThe American Civil Liberties Union asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to review a lower court’s ruling against boycotting Israel, arguing the restriction impedes on First Amendment rights. Pivotal Illinois Supreme Court elections, fueled by Big Money, are on the docketFrom CSTopinion: Two of the court’s seven seats have opened up, and the winners of those seats will determine whether the court is majority conservative or moderate, the Editorial Board writes. Supreme Court denies challenge to Biden's student loan forgiveness programThe appeal from the Brown County Taxpayers Association is one of several percolating in federal courts attempting to stop the effort, which critics argue exceeds the Department of Education's authority. SupremeCourt denied to block Potus Student Debt Relief!!! Yeah. VoteBlueIn2022 Ohio Supreme Court clears Cedar Point in season pass lawsuitThe judges found that Cedar Fair did not have a contractual obligation to operate in May and June of 2020. Joel B.with school president Liz Magill.Column: Why we need term limits for Supreme Court justices The idea of imposing a term limit on Supreme Court justices is gaining traction.Follow Us. Pollak 21 Oct 2022 Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the Court’s most strident liberals, praised her conservative colleague, Justice Clarence Thomas, in a lecture at Roosevelt University in Chicago on Thursday evening, noting his unique compassion for others. Sotomayor was quoted by CNN national political writer Eric Bradner as saying: I have disagreed with [Thomas] more than with any other justice. The previous term saw its six conservative judges and three liberal judges split on major issues including abortion and gun rights. Which means we don’t come together on many cases. This leveled the playing field in labor-management relations that had been tipped sharply toward employers starting with the Pullman Strike of 1894, when President Grover Cleveland’s administration first sought and received court injunctions against the strike to forestall its spread throughout the railroad industry. And yet I can tell you that I spend time with him, understanding that he is one of the few justices who knows practically everybody in our building. "Time will tell whether this is a court that can get back to finding common ground, to ratcheting down the level of decision-making so that we can reach compromises," she added. He knows their name, he knows the things about their life, what their family is suffering. He’ll tell me, you know that person’s wife is sick right now, or that person’s child is having difficulty. She said the test is, "Do we engage with each other in a way that attempts to find common ground, in a way that fosters principled compromise, or is that sort of beyond us?" "That's a work in progress," she added. “But sometimes it’s saying that the courts can’t use certain tools. There’s no other justice who does that. I try, but he does it better. He cares about people. For example, Congress might have protected the Affordable Care Act’s provisions requiring all states to expand eligibility for low-income residents in Medicaid, which states and the federal government jointly fund, by stating that if the court overturned expansion, then Medicaid would be converted into an all-federal program. Now, he cares on legal interests differently. And he sees those legal issues much differently than I do. I tell people, you know Clarence believes, just like him, because he grew up very, very poor, that everyone is capable of picking themselves up by their bootstraps.'s decision upholding most of the act but overturning the mandate for Medicaid expansion and giving states the option of accepting or rejecting it. I understand that some people can’t reach their bootstraps. That’s a fundamental difference in how we view what the law can or should or does do for people. But I can appreciate him. It’s unclear how jurisdiction-stripping might function if Congress codifies abortion rights by law, as Democrats have promised to do if they retain control of both houses; given that states are the source of abortion restrictions in the wake of Dobbs, Congress might wish to leave some authority in the court’s hands to rule on state-level restrictions. Thomas was noted for his friendship with the late liberal icon, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Some Democrats are trying to have him impeached over his wife’s alleged support for efforts to challenge the result of the 2020 presidential election, for which she has been interviewed by the January 6 Committee. Joel B. Whether the voters will support strong action to limit the Supreme Court’s authority depends, of course, on the court’s level of public esteem. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p. In recent months, several justices — notably justices Alito, Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas — have tried to counteract the idea that the court is losing its legitimacy.m. ET (4 p.m. Other than Roberts, who has tried to map out a more centrist conservative course, none of them has shown a willingness to moderate their positions on the major issues being followed by the public. to 7 p. m. PT). Roosevelt to propose a plan in 1936 allowing him to add several new justices to the bench, the so-called court-packing scheme. He is the author of the recent e-book, .