PolitiFact - The Jan 6 committee s planned subpoena of Donald Trump What does it mean HEAD TOPICS

PolitiFact - The Jan 6 committee s planned subpoena of Donald Trump What does it mean

10/22/2022 1:42:00 AM

How have other former presidents responded to congressional subpoenas

Source

PolitiFact

How have other former presidents responded to congressional subpoenas The U.S. House Jan. 6 committee's unanimous decision to subpoena former President Donald Trump is unusual. But pre  One legal case addressing this issue isIn July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the accounting firm had to turn over the documents, though it remanded the caseThe justices drew a distinction between information that would involve executive privilege and information that would not, noting that what was being sought from the accounting firm was personal and not subject to executive privilege. , in which Trump argued that the Jan. 6 committee had no right to demand records related to that day’s events. that both branches of Congress "agree that there is a unique legislative need for these documents" and that they were relevant to the committee’s work involving an attack that threatened the peaceful transfer of power. The judges wrote: Read more:
PolitiFact » Steve Bannon will be sentenced Friday for flouting House Jan. 6 panel Trump subpoenaed by House Jan. 6 panel Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for flouting House Jan. 6 panel Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for flouting House Jan. 6 panel

Bay Middle School assistant principal does Browns victory Monday announcements

On a Cleveland Browns victory Monday, you’ll find Tom Grodek announcing the win loud and clear over the speakers at Bay Middle School. Read more >> Steve Bannon will be sentenced Friday for flouting House Jan. 6 panelSteve Bannon will be sentenced today for criminal contempt of Congress after refusing to comply with the Jan. 6 panel. Prosecutors are seeking a penalty of 6 months in jail and a fine of $200,000. Bannon's continued obstruction warrants longer sentence than recommended. Hope the court takes that into consideration. This will come back to haunt liberals/progressives just like when they lowered the bar on votes in the senate. Enjoy your impending L. Our pathetic country.. Fire bomb a cop car and receive less time. Trump subpoenaed by House Jan. 6 panelThe House Jan. 6 panel has argued that Trump’s efforts to stay in power led to the insurrection. He is expected to challenge the subpoena. This is going to be amazing. PPV it and make billions. Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for flouting House Jan. 6 panelJUST IN — A judge has sentenced former Trump political adviser Steve Bannon to 4 months incarceration and a $6,500 fine for criminal contempt of Congress: Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for flouting House Jan. 6 panelA judge has sentenced former Trump political adviser Steve Bannon to 4 months incarceration and a $6,500 fine for criminal contempt of Congress. White House won't comment on new Jan. 6 committee Trump subpoenaWhite House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre would not comment Friday on the new subpoena calling for former President Donald Trump to testify before the House's January 6 Select Committee. WH won’t comment on anything. White House doesn’t have to. Obama and his wingman Eric Holder direct all of Merrick Garland’s actions. They weaponized the DOJ in 2009. Chris Wray and the jet on standby waiting to see who AG Garland (Obama/Holder) want raided next. Steve Bannon sentenced to 4 months in prison for contempt of CongressFormer Trump White House official Steve Bannon was convicted of contempt of Congress for ignoring a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee. Disgusting They just made him even stronger💪. He’ll wear it like a badge of courage as he continues to fight against the establishment elites. 😆 lol that he didn’t have to testify in the court-martialing of a U.Steve Bannon, former adviser to former President Donald Trump, on Sept.Print WASHINGTON —  The House Jan.Subscribe to our weekday newsletter Add WBUR to your morning routine The email address entered is invalid It's Boston local news in one concise, fun and informative email Thank you! You have been subscribed to WBUR Today. S. Navy doctor; he ultimately sent a deposition, but by then, the case had been dismissed. David Dee Delgado/Getty Images toggle caption David Dee Delgado/Getty Images Steve Bannon, former adviser to former President Donald Trump, on Sept. Meanwhile, Ulysses S. 13 to subpoena the former president as part of its investigation into what led to the Capitol insurrection on Jan. Grant decided to testify in court in support of a friend who was facing fraud charges. David Dee Delgado/Getty Images Former Trump political adviser Steve Bannon heads to a federal courthouse in Washington, D.    Trump’s legal battles over testifying Both during and after his tenure as president, Trump has fought congressional efforts to subpoena him or his documents. One legal case addressing this issue is Trump v., Friday, where he'll be sentenced for criminal contempt of Congress. 4 and appear for what could be a multi-day deposition under oath by Nov. Mazars , in which House committees sought from Trump’s accounting firm certain financial information about him and other family members.  In July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the accounting firm had to turn over the documents, though it remanded the case back to the lower courts to determine the specific limits on the firm’s obligations. 6, 2021, attack on the U. Seven justices signed on to the ruling, while Justice Clarence Thomas concurred and Justice Samuel Alito dissented. Over months of hearings, the committee has argued that blame for the insurrection should be placed squarely on Trump’s efforts to stay in power despite knowing he’d lost the election. The justices drew a distinction between information that would involve executive privilege and information that would not, noting that what was being sought from the accounting firm was personal and not subject to executive privilege. Capitol. "We decline to transplant that protection root and branch to cases involving nonprivileged, private information, which by definition does not implicate sensitive Executive Branch deliberations," the majority wrote. Another case on this point is , in which Trump argued that the Jan." Federal prosecutors are asking U. “In short, you were at the center of the first and only effort by any U. 6 committee had no right to demand records related to that day’s events.  In December 2021, a three-judge panel of the D. District Judge Carl Nichols to throw the book at Bannon.C. Advertisement The committee’s letter, which was signed by its chair, Rep. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that both branches of Congress "agree that there is a unique legislative need for these documents" and that they were relevant to the committee’s work involving an attack that threatened the peaceful transfer of power. In court papers earlier this week, they said Bannon pursued"a bad faith strategy of defiance and contempt. The judges wrote: "We do not come to that conclusion lightly. The confidentiality of presidential communications is critical to the effective functioning of the presidency for the reasons that former President Trump presses, and his effort to vindicate that interest is itself a right of constitutional import. He called House Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo. But our Constitution divides, checks, and balances power to preserve democracy and to ensure liberty. For that reason, the executive privilege for presidential communications is a qualified one that Mr." Bannon used his podcast, which traffics in conspiracy theories, to target people he considered his political enemies. Trump agrees must give way when necessary to protect overriding interests. 6; and notes or memos about the presidential election, the scheme to have fake electors submit false election certificates and the Jan. The President and the Legislative Branch have shown a national interest in and pressing need for the prompt disclosure of these documents. 6 subpoena tracker: Here's who the House select committee wants to hear from Bannon refused to turn over even a single piece of paper to the Jan." In February 2022, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by Trump, effectively ending the case. These two cases suggest Trump would be on weak legal ground in opposing the subpoena, said James Robenalt, a lawyer at the firm Thompson Hine and an expert in separation of powers issues, including Watergate.P. Jan. "In a congressional proceeding, the information must be tightly tied to a legislative purpose and it must overcome ‘the greatest protection’ afforded both executive privilege and attorney-client privilege," Robenalt said. "I think the committee has done enough to overcome that ‘greatest protection’ — they have shown Trump was at the center of the insurrection; that all the critical witnesses are refusing to testify, leaving an absence of alternatives; and that his testimony is critical to their legislative purpose. After his indictment last year, Bannon promised reporters,"this is going to be the misdemeanor from hell for Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden." However, the Supreme Court, which now includes a different mix of justices, might rule differently than it did in 2020. The letter also broadly asks for all communications or memos about messages with key outside players in the committee’s investigation, such as former Trump advisors Stephen K. Still, Congress’ ability to enforce a subpoena is limited. Bannon put on no defense during his trial in July and a jury took fewer than three hours to convict him. To prosecute contempt of Congress, it would have to request the Justice Department to act. Such prosecutions have been rare in recent decades. Rather, they say, Bannon was following advice from his previous attorney. Multiple former presidents have testified before Congress, a fact noted by the committee in its letter to Trump.   The most recent example is the .