Three Ohio justices err in revealing views on abortion issues likely to come before them editorial Editorial - Roe-V-Wade HEAD TOPICS

Three Ohio justices err in revealing views on abortion issues likely to come before them editorial

10/22/2022 2:03:00 AM

EDITORIAL ' In a year when a flurry of abortion litigating and legislating was to be expected in Ohio the decision by these three justices to share their personal abortion views in this way cannot help but further erode trust in the judiciary '

Editorial Roe-V-Wade

Source

clevelanddotcom

EDITORIAL: 'In a year when a flurry of abortion litigating and legislating was to be expected in Ohio, the decision by these three justices to share their personal abortion views in this way cannot help but further erode trust in the judiciary.' In a year when a flurry of abortion litigating and legislating was to be expected in Ohio, the decision by three Ohio Supreme Court justices on the Nov. 8 ballot to share their personal and legal views on abortion and when life begins -- while not technically barred by the state's Code of Judicial Conduct -- cannot help but further erode trust in the judiciary, the editorial board of The Plain Dealer and cleveland.com writes today. on their legal philosophies and views on abortion, as well as other issues. Among the questions they answered were ones that bore on whether Roe v. Wade was rightly decided, when life begins and whether the Ohio Constitution includes any provision “intended to require the use of public funds for abortion.” About a dozen other judicial candidates for appellate and lower judicial office in the three-county Cincinnati area also answered the questions. At least two said they were undecided on the Roe v. Wade question, which asked if they agreed with the proposition that the Constitution does not include the “right to privacy” recognized in Roe -- noting it was, at that point, established law. Read more:
clevelanddotcom » Judge4Yourself releases ratings for Ohio Supreme Court, Cuyahoga County judge races ahead of Nov. 8 election Ohio Supreme Court upholds death penalty in case of prisoner killing another inmate Cedar Point not required to issue refunds for pandemic-shortened season, Ohio Supreme Court rules Ohio Supreme Court clears Cedar Point in season pass lawsuit

Taylor Swift reveals late-night musings on pop album Midnights

Taylor Swift returned to pop on Friday with the debut of her 10th studio album, a record called 'Midnights' inspired by her late-night thoughts, and she also released a video of her 'nightmare scenarios' in the genre of a horror flick. Read more >> Judge4Yourself releases ratings for Ohio Supreme Court, Cuyahoga County judge races ahead of Nov. 8 electionThe legal groups rated two of three Democratic challengers to the Ohio Supreme Court above the Republican candidates. In six of seven races for Common Pleas judge, the groups gave higher scores to incumbents than their challengers. An invaluable source for good information about judicial candidates. Ohio Supreme Court upholds death penalty in case of prisoner killing another inmateThe Ohio Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously upheld the death sentence for an inmate who murdered a fellow prisoner at the Warren Correctional Institute in Lebanon, outside Cincinnati, in 2019. Cedar Point not required to issue refunds for pandemic-shortened season, Ohio Supreme Court rulesThe unanimous court ruled that the park had the right to adjust operating dates and hours without issuing refunds, denying the claim of a Mayfield Heights season passholder who sued the park two years ago, alleging a breach of contract. Ohio Supreme Court clears Cedar Point in season pass lawsuitThe judges found that Cedar Fair did not have a contractual obligation to operate in May and June of 2020. Cleveland judge suspended indefinitely for 'unprecedented' incidents of misconductCLEVELAND, Ohio — The Ohio Supreme Court issued an opinion removing a Cleveland Municipal Court judge from the bench, citing multiple 'unprecedented' incidents of misconduct. Cleveland judge suspended indefinitely for incidents of misconductThe Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday issued an opinion removing a Cleveland Municipal Court judge from the bench, citing multiple incidents of misconduct. questionnaire from Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati on their legal philosophies and views on abortion, as well as other issues.Judge4Yourself.Laura Hancock, cleveland.“The government-mandated shutdown resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the daily lives and businesses of Ohioans statewide,” wrote the court. Among the questions they answered were ones that bore on whether Roe v. Wade was rightly decided, when life begins and whether the Ohio Constitution includes any provision “intended to require the use of public funds for abortion. The legal groups rated two of three Democratic challengers to the Ohio Supreme Court above the Republican candidates.” About a dozen other judicial candidates for appellate and lower judicial office in the three-county Cincinnati area also answered the questions. As she was appealing the case, Drain legally changed her name from Joel Drain , according to Court News Ohio , a service of the Ohio Supreme Court. At least two said they were undecided on the Roe v. Judge4Yourself, which began in 2002, is a nonpartisan collection of five bar associations and a statewide prosecutor’s group that each primary and general election releases ratings of candidates in contested races for judges for Cuyahoga County’s juvenile and common pleas courts, the 8th Ohio District Court of Appeals and the Ohio Supreme Court. Wade question, which asked if they agreed with the proposition that the Constitution does not include the “right to privacy” recognized in Roe -- noting it was, at that point, established law. Cedar Point, which typically opens in May, didn’t open until July 9 in 2020. If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation. 18. Kennedy wrote that the aggravating circumstances, or the conditions that add to the seriousness of an offense, far outweigh any mitigating evidence that would lead to a lesser sentence. Disclaimer .