Graham asks Supreme Court to block his Georgia 2020 election testimony HEAD TOPICS

Graham asks Supreme Court to block his Georgia 2020 election testimony

10/22/2022 1:54:00 AM

Graham R-S C was ordered to appear before a grand jury investigating possible attempts by President Donald Trump and his allies to disrupt Georgia' s 2020 presidential election

Source

The Washington Post

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) asked the Supreme Court Friday to block his required appearance before a Georgia grand jury investigating possible attempts by Donald Trump and his allies to disrupt the state’s 2020 presidential election. Graham (R-S.C.) was ordered to appear before a grand jury investigating possible attempts by President Donald Trump and his allies to disrupt Georgia's 2020 presidential election. Graham would be asked to testify aboutsoon after Trump lost the election to Joe Biden. Prosecutors say Graham has “unique knowledge” about the Trump campaign and the “multistate, coordinated efforts to influence the results” of the election in Georgia and elsewhere. AdvertisementBut Graham has said his actions were legitimate legislative activity protected by the Constitution’s “speech or debate clause.” The senator’s lawyers have said that they have been informed that Graham is a witness — and not a target — of the investigation. Read more:
The Washington Post » Lindsey Graham Must Testify In Georgia Election Investigation, Court Rules Sen. Lindsey Graham asks Supreme Court to block his Jan. 6 testimony in Georgia A British Businessman Is Charged After Allegedly Exporting Artwork for a Russian Oligarch Appeals court: Graham must testify in Georgia election probe

Lumberjacks Defenders Toyotas and a Honda

Toyota has improved its Highlander and Corolla... or have they? Nicole and Eileen tackle that question, Nicole tells of an adventure she had in the backwoods of Vermont, and Eileen shares what it's like to drive the redesigned Honda CR-V and be confused about hotels in Santa Barbara. Read more >> Lindsey Graham Must Testify In Georgia Election Investigation, Court RulesJUST IN: A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) must testify before a Georgia grand jury investigating Donald Trump and his campaign over their alleged efforts to upend the state’s 2020 election results. If he puts his hand on the Bible it might burst into flames. LindseyGraham Couldn't happen to a nicer guy getting his karma 😉 Sen. Lindsey Graham asks Supreme Court to block his Jan. 6 testimony in GeorgiaGraham R-S C was ordered to appear before a grand jury investigating possible attempts by President Donald Trump and his allies to disrupt Georgia' s 2020 presidential election A British Businessman Is Charged After Allegedly Exporting Artwork for a Russian OligarchGraham Bonham-Carter was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly moving an artwork across national borders. Appeals court: Graham must testify in Georgia election probeA federal appeals court says U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham must testify before a special grand jury investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in Georgia Court Rules Sen. Graham Must Testify in Georgia Election ProbeA federal appeals court ruled Thursday Sen. Lindsey Graham must testify in front of a Georgia grand jury investigating former president Donald Trump’s attempts to meddle with the state’s election results. Thoughts and prayers Lindsey If lindseygraham thought he was right & was proud of what he did, he wouldn't be fighting this. I’ll believe it when you write about it in the past tense Appeals court: Graham must testify in Georgia election probeSen. Lindsey Graham must testify before a special grand jury investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in Georgia. .By.ArrowRight A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.statement  alleged that the prominent British businessman continued to oversee maintenance and transactions related to three of Deripaska’s residential properties, including two in New York, following sanctions imposed on him in 2018 by the US government. Willis also wants to question former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Graham would be asked to testify about soon after Trump lost the election to Joe Biden. Prosecutors say Graham has “unique knowledge” about the Trump campaign and the “multistate, coordinated efforts to influence the results” of the election in Georgia and elsewhere. Graham had claimed that a sitting senator is shielded from such investigations. Advertisement But Graham has said his actions were legitimate legislative activity protected by the Constitution’s “speech or debate clause.” The senator’s lawyers have said that they have been informed that Graham is a witness — and not a target — of the investigation. In March, following the Russian invasion of  Ukraine , the US Treasury Department announced the formation of an international task force to target assets owned by blacklisted Russians with links to President Vladimir Putin. Last month, a district court judge said prosecutors could not question Graham about portions of the calls that were legislative fact-finding. McGahn told the Supreme Court , “Senator Graham will suffer the precise injury he is appealing to prevent: being questioned in state court about his legislative activity and official acts. But the judge said Willis’s team could explore possible coordination with the Trump campaign in its post-election efforts in Georgia; public statements regarding the 2020 election; and any efforts to “cajole” or “exhort” Georgia election officials. The status of key investigations involving Donald Trump In its order Thursday, the 11th Circuit panel agreed with the lower court judge that those actions “could not qualify as legislative activities under any understanding of Supreme Court precedent.” Two of the three judges on the panel were nominated by Trump. This is a developing story. Advertisement Graham may still assert his rights, the court noted, if there is a dispute about certain questions. While other sanctioned oligarchs have remained out of public view in the aftermath of Russian’s invasion of Ukraine , Deripaska was present for the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum SPIEF 2022 in June. McGahn said the case should not proceed without Supreme Court weighing in. “The district court’s refusal to quash or at least stay this impermissible questioning—and the Eleventh Circuit’s cursory acquiescence, while misquoting the ‘Speech or Debate Clause,’ failing to invoke or apply the standard for a stay, and without so much as mentioning sovereign immunity—cries out for review,” he wrote. 6 insurrection. McGahn said the district attorney can continue the investigation without Graham by questioning “other witnesses who are not immunized by the United States Constitution.” The Jan. 6 insurrection .