Graham asks Supreme Court to intervene after election ruling U.S. Supreme Court - Politics HEAD TOPICS
Graham asks Supreme Court to intervene after election ruling
10/22/2022 12:42:00 AM Sen Lindsey Graham has asked the U S Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court ordered him to testify before a special grand jury in Georgia investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election
U S Supreme Court Politics
Source The Associated Press
Sen Lindsey Graham has asked the U S Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court ordered him to testify before a special grand jury in Georgia investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court ordered him to testify before a special grand jury in Georgia investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in the state. Raffensperger said Graham asked whether he had the power to reject certain absentee ballots, something Raffensperger took as a suggestion to toss out legally cast votes. Graham has dismissed that interpretation as “ridiculous.”Graham had challenged his subpoena, saying his position as a U.S. senator protected him from having to testify in the state investigation. He has also denied wrongdoing. The judges on Thursday rejected Graham’s argument, saying he “has failed to demonstrate that this approach will violate his rights under the Speech and Debate Clause.” Read more:
The Associated Press » Appeals court orders Sen. Lindsey Graham to testify in Georgia election probe Sen. Lindsey Graham asks Supreme Court to block subpoena in criminal probe of 2020 election Court Rules Sen. Graham Must Testify in Georgia Election Probe Sen. Lindsey Graham asks the Supreme Court to block a subpoena from an Atlanta grand jury investigating 2020 election interference CNN Politics Get to know Cindy Hsu
We're getting to know our very own Cindy Hsu a little better with a series of rapid-fire questions. Read more >> Appeals court orders Sen. Lindsey Graham to testify in Georgia election probeThe South Carolina senator has fought a lengthy legal battle arguing he shouldn't have to testify in a Fulton County criminal probe into possible 2020 election interference. Go investigate hunter emails And the political bs continues… economy crashing, first-time-global recession, nuclear war threat, energy crisis and our law makers want to play political kabuki nonsense! No wonder the world is going to hell in a basket! 🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻 Sen. Lindsey Graham asks Supreme Court to block subpoena in criminal probe of 2020 electionNEW: Sen. Lindsey Graham asks Supreme Court to halt a subpoena compelling him to testify in a Georgia county prosecutor’s criminal probe of potential interference in the 2020 election. A coward that is guilty, always finds ways to hide against jurisdictions of the law. Ladybugs Lindsey is guilty as a ladybug around his anus. Puss Court Rules Sen. Graham Must Testify in Georgia Election ProbeA federal appeals court ruled Thursday Sen. Lindsey Graham must testify in front of a Georgia grand jury investigating former president Donald Trump ’s attempts to meddle with the state’s election results. Thoughts and prayers Lindsey If lindseygraham thought he was right & was proud of what he did, he wouldn't be fighting this. I’ll believe it when you write about it in the past tense Sen. Lindsey Graham asks the Supreme Court to block a subpoena from an Atlanta grand jury investigating 2020 election interference CNN PoliticsSenator Lindsey Graham asked the Supreme Court to block a subpoena from the Atlanta-area special grand jury investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia . He’s such a fraud. I guess when you live in a world of make believe you are not really interested in the actual truth! Everybody's God damned argument is 'but I was crime-ing while acting as a public official so I should never be held accountable and the law simply doesn't apply to me.' How in the actual f*** is that supposed to be an argument that works? Our nation is dying from stupidity. Appeals court rejects Lindsey Graham's bid to avoid testifying before Atlanta election fraud grand juryA federal appeals court Thursday rejected South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham 's bid to avoid testifying before an Atlanta grand jury investigating whether former President Donald Trump interfered in the 2020 election. Great news. He’s been trying to evade truth for months. Graham is fighting democracy at every turn. leiachakroun So he’ll just go before the Grand Jury and lie…or take the Fifth. If he had nothing to hide it, wouldn’t be a problem for him to testify. Is there anything like it? Appeals court rejects Lindsey Graham's bid to avoid testifying before Atlanta election fraud grand juryA federal appeals court rejected Sen. Lindsey Graham 's bid to avoid testifying before an Atlanta grand jury investigating whether former President Donald Trump interfered in the 2020 election. Time to go Lyndsey They need to get it done. Taxpayer group asks high court to stop loan forgiveness plan Raffensperger said Graham asked whether he had the power to reject certain absentee ballots, something Raffensperger took as a suggestion to toss out legally cast votes.CNN .on Friday to halt a subpoena compelling him to testify in a Georgia county prosecutor’s criminal probe of potential interference in the 2020 election.5:50PM ET Rebecca Noble/Getty Images A federal appeals court ruled Thursday Sen. Graham has dismissed that interpretation as “ridiculous.” Graham had challenged his subpoena, saying his position as a U. He filed suit in federal court seeking to quash a subpoena seeking details about he made to top election officials in Georgia amid complaints from then-President Donald Trump that there had been widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.S.S. senator protected him from having to testify in the state investigation. In a unanimous ruling Thursday, a three judge panel of the 11th Circuit U. He has also denied wrongdoing.. The judges on Thursday rejected Graham’s argument, saying he “has failed to demonstrate that this approach will violate his rights under the Speech and Debate Clause. Court of Appeals disagreed with Graham's argument that his actions were protected under the U. Constitution’s speech and debate clause.” Graham is represented by former White House counsel Don McGahn, who was involved in a lengthy court fight over a congressional subpoena for his own testimony related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. After years of back-and-forth, the two sides reached an agreement and McGahn answered investigators’ questions in a private session. Constitution's speech and debate clause. The filing was directed to Justice Clarence Thomas, who handles emergency appeals from Georgia and several other Southern states. It argues the court needs to step in or else Graham's"constitutional immunities will be lost, and his statutorily guaranteed appeal mooted, the moment the local Georgia prosecutor questions him. Thomas can act on his own or refer the matter to the full court. The judges agreed with a lower court's ruling that Graham's view of those constitutional protections were too broad, and that he should be able to answer some key questions from the grand jury, including whether he consulted with Trump's campaign before making the calls. ADVERTISEMENT Trump’s lawyers recently submitted a Supreme Court application to Thomas asking the Supreme Court to step into a legal fight over the classified documents seized during an FBI search of Trump’s Florida estate. Thomas has previously come under scrutiny for his vote in a different Trump documents case, in which he was the only member of the court to vote against allowing the House committee investigating the Jan. Even assuming that the Clause protects informal legislative investigations, the district court’s approach ensures that Senator Graham will not be questioned about such investigations," the ruling said. Kelly O'Donnell. 6, 2021, Capitol riot to obtain Trump records held by the National Archives and Records Administration. Thomas’ wife, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, is a conservative activist and staunch Trump supporter who attended the Jan." Aug. 6 “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse and wrote to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in the weeks following the election encouraging him to work to overturn Biden’s victory and keep Trump in office. ADVERTISEMENT She also contacted lawmakers in Arizona and Wisconsin in the weeks after the election. Graham’s lawyers have previously indicated that if they lost in the 11th Circuit, they would appeal to the Supreme Court. Thomas was recently interviewed by the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection, and she stood by the false claim that the 2020 election was fraudulent. Willis has said publicly she’s investigating a pair of post-election phone calls Graham made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, and his staff. ___ Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP ___ Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report. Graham has denied that was his intention. AP NEWS .