Hodlonaut' s Tweets Calling Craig Wright a ' Scammer' Were Not Unlawful Court Rules CoinMarketCap HEAD TOPICS

Hodlonaut' s Tweets Calling Craig Wright a ' Scammer' Were Not Unlawful Court Rules CoinMarketCap

10/21/2022 6:17:00 PM

Judge Helen Engebrigtsen ruled that Hodlonaut whose real name is Magnus Granath is not liable for damages as a result of the posts he made on Twitter

Source

CoinMarketCap

Judge Helen Engebrigtsen ruled that Hodlonaut, whose real name is Magnus Granath, is not liable for damages as a result of the posts he made on Twitter Judge Helen Engebrigtsen ruled that Hodlonaut whose real name is Magnus Granath is not liable for damages as a result of the posts he made on Twitter The court ruling outlined some of the tweets that Hodlonaut — who was working as a primary school teacher at the time — had written back in March 2019. One had said:"Craig Wright is a very sad and pathetic scammer. Clearly mentally ill. Everything about him induces deep cringe. I suffer from obviousness fatigue after still having two read posts arguing why he isn't Satoshi." He ended up deleting the tweets in question — some of which had included the hashtag #CraigWrightIsAScammer.Granath successfully argued that his allegations were not defamatory (damaging someone's reputation,) nor did they violate Dr. Wright's privacy. Read more:
CoinMarketCap » Helen Mirren doesn’t think she’s very funny Trump Rips 'Partisan Hack' Judge Who Ruled He Deliberately Lied About Vote Fraud In Suit Judge Who Ruled Against CFPB Took Thousands in Wall Street Campaign Cash: Watchdog Judge Rejects Republican Bid to Block Biden’s Student-Loan Forgiveness Program

Wildfires Erupt in the Pacific Northwest

A series of recent wildfires ignited or spread this past week as warm, dry, and windy conditions—a rarity for the rainy Pacific Northwest. Read more >> How come everyone is silent on this Helen Mirren doesn’t think she’s very funnyHelen Mirren says they don't let her ad-lib, but she does have a funny pitch for the show Trump Rips 'Partisan Hack' Judge Who Ruled He Deliberately Lied About Vote Fraud In SuitTrump yet again presses 'rigged vote' claims in personal attack, even though a federal judge determined this week that he knows better. Trump needs to pull his head in with these continual narcissistic lies……. He wants attention & he wants to incite his shadow army again. We would be wise to pay attention to DOJ, the courts & the Jan. 6th Committee instead of falling for his every tirade. Judge Who Ruled Against CFPB Took Thousands in Wall Street Campaign Cash: Watchdog'The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever.' accountable_us revolvingdoorDC accountable_us revolvingdoorDC WHEN BRIBERY IS LEGALIZED 😜 THE ELECTIONS ARE RIGGED🖕🏾🖕🖕🏼😝🤬 accountable_us revolvingdoorDC That is a dude who looks like he is going to just snap and take some people out one dark day. Judge Rejects Republican Bid to Block Biden’s Student-Loan Forgiveness ProgramRepublican officials from six states don’t have legal standing to mount a challenge to the Biden administration’s debt cancellation program, the federal judge ruled. As big of a bailout as the stimulus package from Obama. TARP (Troubles Asset Relief Program) was not a bailout. Those were loans and the Gov made money off those loans. The stimulus was a bailout for mostly liberal school districts and student debt is a bailout for Colleges Pay off my car loan so I can afford to buy gas to put in my car. A veteran. Alabama execution methods ‘shrouded in mystery,’ federal judge says in call for transparencyA federal appellate judge said Alabama’s process of allowing death row inmates to change their method of execution in the summer of 2018 was “shrouded in mystery” and should have been more transparent. Man accused of killing Seattle woman, violating her remains appears before judgeAccording to charging documents, Charles Becker killed the mother of three, stored her body in his home, dismembered it, and then threw it away near the University of Washington. Why did he serve so little time for killing his infant? My God. Sawant supporter. cmkshama What a sick puke And crucially, Dr.Yesterday 12:56PM Mirren says that the only way she can do comedy is to be “as serious” as possible and that if she were “ever a part of a comedy team,” she would “definitely be the straight man” and not “the funny one.Trump yet again presses"rigged vote" claims in personal attack, even though a federal judge determined this week that he knows better."The financial services industry's relentless attacks on the CFPB proves its work protecting consumers is more vital than ever," said one advocate. Wright is now being ordered to cover Granath's legal costs to the tune of 4.05 million Norwegian krone — that's about $380,791. She may think being a straight man is the less important part of doing comedy, but she’s actually fantastically good at it—and therefore good at comedy Which, as it turns out, is basically the premise of the Consequence profile, as revealed by her pitch at the end about how Documentary Now! should eventually do a behind-the-scenes documentary about the making of Documentary Now! where she can play herself as the in-universe host of the show. The court ruling outlined some of the tweets that Hodlonaut — who was working as a primary school teacher at the time — had written back in March 2019. One had said: "Craig Wright is a very sad and pathetic scammer.) Advertisement Mirren might also be underselling her ability to be funny elsewhere in the chat, saying that she sometimes will ad-lib her lines with little jokes (like calling herself a “sexy young thing”), and the people making the show will just politely let her finish and then edit it out of the final show. Clearly mentally ill. Circuit Court of Appeals between 2014 and 2018, when he was a Republican candidate and member of the Mississippi House of Representatives. Everything about him induces deep cringe.. I suffer from obviousness fatigue after still having two read posts arguing why he isn't Satoshi." He ended up deleting the tweets in question — some of which had included the hashtag #CraigWrightIsAScammer. Granath successfully argued that his allegations were not defamatory (damaging someone's reputation,) nor did they violate Dr. Wright's privacy.) and other consumer advocates. He went on to add that the Australian entrepreneur had failed to provide evidence that he had Satoshi Nakamoto's encryption keys — and although Dr. Wright explained he had destroyed them during the trial, "there are no good reasons for doing this." What the Court Said Judge Engebrigtsen ultimately concluded that context was crucial. In the judicial order translated from Norwegian by CoinDesk, she wrote: "The meaning of the designation 'swindler' is not the same if you are referred to as a fraudster at a police seminar on ID theft as when you are called a 'swindler' on Twitter in a heated discussion about whether one has succeeded in proving his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto." In her eyes, "it is not unusual to use strong words on Twitter, and this affects the interpretation and meaning of the terms used. " And she said that use of words including "fraud," "fake" and "scammer" cannot be regarded as an allegation that Dr. Wright had acted criminally. "One of Granath's statements includes a message that Wright is 'clearly mentally ill'. The court understands this primarily as a value assessment in the sense of 'he is confused/disillusioned/insane' when he claims that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Using the term 'insane' if someone you believe is behaving incredibly or strangely is common and, in the court's opinion, cannot be understood as an actual claim that someone has been diagnosed with a mental illness. The court perceives Granath's use of 'clearly mentally ill' as an expression of force." A clear distinction is also drawn between the use of social media, and a defamatory statement that is made on television. "There is a lot of strong language on Twitter. The format of the media encourages strong descriptions and characteristics. Swear words, insults and profanity are common. Granath's formulations are quite typical of the jargon on Twitter, and the statements are therefore perceived in the court's view as less offensive on Twitter than they would be on [the evening news.]" While Dr. Wright had attempted to argue that the hashtag #CraigWrightIsAScammer had encouraged Hodlonaut's followers to pile in with their own messages, the court did not agree "that this is understood as an invitation for others to bully" him. "Hashtags are common on social media in general and Twitter in particular, and are a way of sorting conversations or topics. The court cannot see that Granath's use of the hashtag deviates from this. " It was also noted that debate about Dr. Wright's claims had been taking place since 2016 — with 7,000 messages over a three-year period, and some of them also including similar language. Overall, the judge said that Granath's statements "have a core of allegations of a factual nature." It could be argued that Dr. Wright had one small win in a case that was otherwise a slam dunk for Hodlonaut. "Both parties in the case have pointed to circumstances that speak respectively for and against Dr. Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto. The question has been debated since 2016. The court chooses not to take a position on this, because it has no bearing on the outcome of the case." Nonetheless, the judge notes that it wasn't just Hodlonaut who had questioned Dr. Wright's claims — as "in media coverage, the prevailing opinion was that Dr. Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto." "Wright has come out with a controversial claim, and must withstand criticism from dissenters. Overall, the court believes that the wording and claims made by Granath do not exceed the threshold for defamation and infringement of privacy. The statements are not unlawful. " 0 people liked this article I cover the crazy world of crypto. Related Articles .