Steve Bannon Gets Four Months in the Slammer for Defying Jan 6 Subpoena Washington - D.C. HEAD TOPICS

Steve Bannon Gets Four Months in the Slammer for Defying Jan 6 Subpoena

10/21/2022 6:09:00 PM

However Judge Carl J Nichols agreed to delay the sentence while Bannon appeals

Washington D C

Source

The Daily Beast

Staunch Trump ally Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison Friday for contempt of Congress after he repeatedly fobbed off subpoenas to testify and provide documents to the House committee probing the Capitol riot. However Judge Carl J Nichols agreed to delay the sentence while Bannon appeals to the House committee probing the Capitol riot.However, D.C. federal court Judge Carl J. Nichols agreed to delay the sentence while Bannon appeals—as long as an appeal is “timely.”Prosecutors had asked Nichols to toss Bannon in prisonfor six months for his “sustained, bad-faith contempt of Congress” which “exacerbated” the assault on the Capitol. “The Defendant has expressed no remorse for his conduct and attacked others at every turn,” the feds wrote in a sentencing memo earlier this week.Lawyers for Bannon, who claimed executive privilege prevented him from complying with the subpoena, asked Nichols to sentence Bannon to probation only, and to allow him to remain free on bond pending an appeal. In a rambling argument on Friday, Read more:
The Daily Beast » Nate Monroe: Federal judge delivers historic rebuke to Jacksonville City Council Judge: Trump signed court document that knowingly included false voter fraud stats Judge says John Eastman emails about Trump election challenge must be given to Jan. 6 probe Ohio judge removed after being accused of 100-plus instances of misconduct

Police 4 officers struck by car in Queens suspects in custody

Four officers have been injured after being struck by a stolen car in Queens Thursday night. Read more >> Nate Monroe: Federal judge delivers historic rebuke to Jacksonville City CouncilNATE MONROE It's all in there: the contempt for public feedback, the unapologetic and naked self-interest, the incompetence that has come to define this era of City Hall politics. This column is a truth-bomb masterpiece and a must read! Judge: Trump signed court document that knowingly included false voter fraud statsFormer President Donald Trump signed legal documents describing evidence of election fraud that he knew were false, a federal judge indicated on Wednesday. LockHimUp Stop with the election interference. The evidence of the stolen election in 2020 is overwhelming, despite the gaslighting. It will all be adjudicated after the republicans win a significant majority in less than a month. Lock him up! Judge says John Eastman emails about Trump election challenge must be given to Jan. 6 probeEight of John Eastman's emails about Donald Trump's election challenge were subject to the 'crime-fraud exception' to attorney-client privilege, the order said. Who gives a hoot about this BS! Ohio judge removed after being accused of 100-plus instances of misconductAn Ohio judge was suspended indefinitely from her position on Tuesday after being accused of over 100 instances of misconduct, including lying and wrongfully waiving fines for defendants. The more you read about this judge, the more you wonder what took so long... Trump Knowingly Signed False Election Fraud Docs, Judge SaysDonald Trump signed legal documents that included false voter fraud information—and did so even after he learned the data was incorrect, a federal judge revealed on Wednesday. The crimes are getting old and long. Wake me when he's indicted! Lock him out now! Prison NOW A Judge Said Trump Signed Court Documents That He Knew Included LiesThe ruling from a federal judge in California concerned a fight between the Jan. 6 committee and former Trump legal adviser John Eastman, but contained a shocking claim about the former president. fobbed off subpoenas to testify and provide documents to the House committee probing the Capitol riot.The broken promise that broke Jacksonville Howard, a George W.By 10/19/2022 03:31 PM EDT Link Copied U.WATCH LIVE Key Points A federal judge ordered attorney John Eastman to turn over multiple documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. However, D.C. It's all in there: the contempt for public feedback, the unapologetic and naked self interest, the incompetence that has come to define this era of City Hall politics. federal court Judge Carl J. 6 select committee. Nichols agreed to delay the sentence while Bannon appeals—as long as an appeal is “timely. "On the record before the Court, it appears that as to the Challenged Districts, no adjustments, great or small, were even proposed, much less adopted, to unify communities, reduce (Black voter) percentages, or increase compactness.” Prosecutors had asked Nichols to toss Bannon in prison for six months for his “sustained, bad-faith contempt of Congress” which “exacerbated” the assault on the Capitol. District Court in Santa Ana, California. “The Defendant has expressed no remorse for his conduct and attacked others at every turn,” the feds wrote in a sentencing memo earlier this week. Jacksonville City Council members, however, not only had no such reservations, that shameless ambition is now an argument key to the . While Carter concluded that some of the materials fell under that privilege, he ruled that Eastman must disclose four emails to congressional investigators because they are evidence of a likely crime. Lawyers for Bannon, who claimed executive privilege prevented him from complying with the subpoena, asked Nichols to sentence Bannon to probation only, and to allow him to remain free on bond pending an appeal. In a rambling argument on Friday, David Schoen , who also represented Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial, argued that the Jan. Protecting incumbent council members was a top priority In reality, that self interest morphed into something insidious: The council used race to segregate voters in ways the incumbents perceived was favorable to them. 6 committee was overly political, that Bannon’s desire to respect executive-privilege was “the type of conduct we should be encouraging in this country,” and that over-excited prosecutors were trying to “make Mr. Bannon their trophy. It has such a high concentration of voters because, as the public record indicated, and Howard agreed, Pittman simply refused to sign off on any change to it. Eight of Eastman's emails were subject to that "crime-fraud exception," according to the order in U. ” Nichols, however, said the Jan. 6 committee had “every right to investigate what happened that day,” calling the riot “undeniably serious. The result is a council map with bizarre, non-logical, non-compact districts, particularly in West and Northwest Jacksonville, where the bulk of the city's Black voters live.” He ripped Bannon’s “executive privilege” argument to shreds, noting that Trump waived the privilege earlier this year—but Bannon still failed to hand over a “single document.” Furthermore, some of the information sought in the committee’s subpoenas had “no conceivable claim of executive privilege,” he said. Instead, the council bleached them to protect the white incumbents, doing so with the blessing of the Black council members who were eager to shield their own inappropriately packed districts. However, he did acknowledge that Bannon appeared to be following legal advice, rather than ignoring the subpoena entirely. Another four emails "demonstrate an effort by President Trump and his attorneys to press false claims in federal court for the purpose of delaying the January 6 vote," Carter wrote. And he questioned why the committee didn’t sue him to enforce its subpoena rather than seeking out a criminal contempt prosecution.. Prosecutors had argued that Trump’s attorney “made clear” Bannon was not merely acting on the former resident’s instructions. The former White House chief strategist and one-time Goldman Sachs investment banker, who has turned to podcasting as he fights . the boundaries between packed and stripped districts divide Black residents from white residents with surgical precision," the plaintiffs wrote.