NFL fans slam analyst for claiming Rams owners ignoring Super Bowl win in St. Louis after paying $790m to city Notifications New User posted their first comment this is comment text Approve Reject & ban Delete Logout

STFU Florio - NFL fans slam analyst for claiming Rams owners are ignoring Super Bowl win in St Louis after paying $790m to city

General view of Super Bowl XXXIV The Los Angeles Rams are the reigning Super Bowl champions. After defeating and the Cincinati Bengals at SoFi Stadium, Matthew Stafford and Co. hoisted the Lombardi Trophy aloft. The win marked the second time that the Rams had won the Super Bowl. However, it seems that owner Stan Kroenke and COO Kevin Demoff have forgotten about , according to Mike Florio. Pro Football Talk's Florio called out the high-ranking pair for, apparently, forgetting about the team's win back in 2000. It's next-level petty for Kroenke and Demoff to pretend that the Rams didn't win a Super Bowl in St. Louis. If St. Louis hadn't forced a $790M settlement for team and league shenanigans associated with the move, there definitely would be two Lombardis on that ring.It's next-level petty for Kroenke and Demoff to pretend that the Rams didn't win a Super Bowl in St. Louis. If St. Louis hadn't forced a $790M settlement for team and league shenanigans associated with the move, there definitely would be two Lombardis on that ring. As expected, this caught the attention of LA fans on social media and they were quick to come forward with their thoughts. One fan pointed out that the team, in fact, did not forget about their first championship win and posted a sentence from the team's official website which read: "From the Rams website.. 'There are two stars to pay homage to the franchise's two Super Bowl Championships'... STFU, Florio.." From the Rams website..

"There are two stars to pay homage to the franchise's two Super Bowl Championships"

STFU, Florio.. It's next-level petty for Kroenke and Demoff to pretend that the Rams didn't win a Super Bowl in St. Louis. If St. Louis hadn't forced a $790M settlement for team and league shenanigans associated with the move, there definitely would be two Lombardis on that ring.It's next-level petty for Kroenke and Demoff to pretend that the Rams didn't win a Super Bowl in St. Louis. If St. Louis hadn't forced a $790M settlement for team and league shenanigans associated with the move, there definitely would be two Lombardis on that ring.From the Rams website.. "There are two stars to pay homage to the franchise's two Super Bowl Championships"STFU, Florio.. One fan commented on the post by writing, "slow news day?" Slow news day? Slow news day? A fan named Fresco asked Florio to read the design details before putting out misinformation. Can y’all read the design details first before putting out misinformation Can y’all read the design details first before putting out misinformation One user said that the two stars on the Super Bowl ring represent the two Super Bowls won. The two stars on the side represent that The two stars on the side represent that A fan named Ian said that it was a sad take and also a wrong take from Florio. What a sad, sad take.

Also, it's wrong. The ring *does* include homage to the first SB title we picked up. What a sad, sad take.Also, it's wrong. The ring *does* include homage to the first SB title we picked up. One fan asked Florio to speak less. say less say less One user called Florio a "dork" for his thoughts on the ring. You're a dork bro You're a dork bro One fan commented and asked Florio to read the fine print. Oh fer fukks sake, read the fine print. Oh fer fukks sake, read the fine print. One fan commented that Florio's take was next-level petty. Next-level petty that this is your hot take Next-level petty that this is your hot take Another fan replied and said that the LA side's website literally said that the two stars on the ring are for both Super Bowl titles. They literally said on their site that the two stars are for both rings They literally said on their site that the two stars are for both rings

Rams favored to go back-to-back

Super Bowl LVI - Los Angeles v Cincinnati Bengals LA are once again among the favorites for the Super Bowl. With the NFC being considerably weaker this season than the AFC, the number of teams that could challenge Sean McVay's team are small. and the Green Bay Packers were weakened by the departure of Davante Adams. The Buccaneers will be without Rob Gronkowski and, for the first half of the season, . In their own division, the Arizona Cardinals and the San Francisco 49ers are perhaps LA's toughest challengers. So, if they can make it out of the division, then a deep playoff run is definitely on the cards. Matthew Stafford has another preseason under his belt, he will no doubt be better in 2022. So, look out for McVay's team to be there when the whips are cracking in the new year. NFL Injuries: Find out about ? Poll : 0 votes Quick Links More from Sportskeeda Thank You! Show More Comments No thanks Delete Cancel Update Reply ❮ ❯ No thanks Delete Cancel Update Reply ❮ ❯ Be the first one to comment on this story More from Sportskeeda Fetching more content... 1 Logout No Results Found