Should you be worried about facial recognition?​

Should you be worried about facial recognition?​

Should you be worried about facial recognition?​ Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again. × Search search POPULAR SEARCHES SUGGESTED LINKS Join AARP for just $9 per year when you sign up for a 5-year term. Get instant access to members-only products and hundreds of discounts, a free second membership, and a subscription to AARP the Magazine. Leaving AARP.org Website You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.

Government s Use of Facial Recognition Under Scrutiny

IRS decides to allow other ID verification methods after privacy advocates raise alarms

Getty Images Facial recognition has long been a divisive issue.
Proponents say the technology is an effective tool for catching bad guys and verifying who we say we are. Critics counter that it is an invasion of privacy, potentially inaccurate and racially biased — and may even result in wrongful arrests. Because of the complexity of the issue, AARP has not taken a position at this time. Get instant access to members-only products and hundreds of discounts, a free second membership, and a subscription to AARP the Magazine. As a consumer, you may welcome the ease of unlocking your smartphone by showing your face. However, you may be less keen about the prospect of having to upload a selfie and use your mug to access tax data online. Yet that was what the had been asking people to do — until the agency announced a change in plans in early February.

IRS moves away from facial recognition

Under a controversial new identity verification process that had been scheduled to kick in this summer , taxpayers who wanted to would have provide d a photo from a , state ID or passport and have it matched against an uploaded selfie captured via smartphone or webcam. The IRS was planning to use a private Virginia-based verification company called ID.me that has its facial recognition technology in use at other federal agencies and in 30 states, in some instances to verify the identities of people filing unemployment insurance claims. ID.me says its technology helps combat fraud perpetrated by people using , and that it has prevented the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars in government benefits over the past 18 months. The company’s accounts are also used to verify the identity of military veterans so that on products ranging from Oakley sunglasses to HP laptops. But critics such as Caitlin Seeley George, campaign director at the Boston-based digital advocacy group Fight for the Future, called for the IRS to halt the plan. “Unlike a Social Security number or credit card number, you can never change your face.”​​ — Jennifer Lynch, Electronic Frontier Foundation “This is an example of just how facial recognition has spread widely to a point where it is touching so many parts of really everyone’s lives,” George said before the IRS announcement. “In this specific case, it’s really raised to a level of concern because everyone has to do taxes.” She worrie d that a database of biometric scans, images of government IDs and those selfies would “more than likely be shared with different departments within the government” and also become a huge target for hackers, she said. George was concerned that ID.me’s privacy language was “obviously very vague and unsettling,” suggesting that it retains the right to share data with other partners under certain circumstances. ID.me declined an AARP request for an interview. Instead, the company directed AARP to its blog, where a distinction was made between one-to-one (1:1) , which is similar to the way you unlock a smartphone, and one-to-many (1:many), in which a photo of your face is compared with others in a database. “Selfies are critical to verifying identity and preventing fraud,” the company wrote. “We use ‘1:1’ matching for identity verification, and ‘1:many’ for fraud detection. We do not share selfies with any government agency unless fraud is detected.” ID.me added that “1:many is internal to ID.me and does not involve any external or government database. It occurs once during enrollment and exists to make sure a single attacker is not registering multiple identities. The selfie is turned into a mathematical representation of a face and then compared against multiple accounts to see if a single person has registered multiple different identities that do not belong to them.” As part of a LinkedIn post in late January, ID.me founder and CEO Blake Hall wrote: “We avoid disclosing methods we use to stop identity theft and organized crime as it jeopardizes their effectiveness.” But after the IRS backed away from its facial recognition plans, Hall also retreated. He announced that ID.me would provide its government clients an alternative verification option that does not involve facial recognition.

New manual review offered

ID.me in late February put together what it is calling a Human in the Loop team of reviewers to weigh in if an ID card or selfie match is rejected during the automated process with the company’s government partners. If the information passes this manual review, users can continue identity verification through the automated process. If the document or selfie does n't pass muster, then users are directed to a one-to-one live video chat to verify with a human agent. AARP NEWSLETTERS %{ newsLetterPromoText }% %{ description }% Subscribe Flowers & Gifts 25% off sitewide and 30% off select items See more Flowers & Gifts offers > "Unlike a Social Security number or credit card number, you can never change your face,” she says. “Once we are all in a face recognition database, then it becomes possible to attach those databases to camera networks that are out in society and identify people as they walk about through society.”
Think about the possibility of, for example, discovering the name and other details of an attractive stranger you pass on the street.

IRS looks to balance privacy fraud protection br

Fight for the Future, the Algorithmic Justice League, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and other civil rights organizations launched a website calling for people to take action against the IRS plan. In announcing plans to develop an additional online verification process that doesn't involve facial recognition, IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig acknowledged the concerns that were raised. “The IRS is consistently looking for ways to make the filing process more secure, but to be clear, no American is required to take a selfie in order to file their tax return,” the U.S. Treasury Department said in a statement. “We believe in the importance of of taxpayers while also ensuring criminals are not able to gain access [to] taxpayer accounts. “The lack of funding for IRS IT modernization has made it impossible for the IRS to invest in state-of-the-art technology. The IRS today uses third-party service providers to validate the identification of individuals attempting to improperly gain access to taxpayer accounts,” the Treasury Department said. “This includes ID.me, which is compliant with the National Institute of Security Technology standards and used by multiple agencies across the government.” The public outcry over facial recognition certainly predates the IRS situation. In 2020, Pope Francis raised ethical concerns around the technology. Several U.S. states and cities have enacted bans or limited its use by the police. Tech giants Amazon, Facebook, IBM and Microsoft have all backed away from facial recognition, at least to some degree. ​“We believe in the importance of protecting the privacy of taxpayers while also ensuring criminals are not able to gain access [to] taxpayer accounts.” — U.S. Treasury Department statement​ This past November, Facebook announced it would delete more than a billion individual facial recognition templates, meaning those on the social network who opted into a Face Recognition setting will no longer be recognized automatically in photos and videos. Still, Facebook is reluctant to give up on the tech forever. “Looking ahead, we still see facial recognition technology as a powerful tool, for example, for people needing to verify their identity, or to prevent fraud and impersonation,” Jérôme Pesenti, who heads artificial intelligence efforts at Facebook parent Meta, wrote in a blog entry. “We believe facial recognition can help for products like these with privacy, transparency and control in place, so you decide if and how your face is used. We will continue working on these technologies and engaging outside experts.”

Fighting romance scams finding missing persons

One company still deeply committed to facial recognition is Clearview AI, whose software is used by law enforcement. Cofounder and Chief Executive Hoan Ton-That cited cases where Clearview’s facial recognition has helped catch criminals preying on the elderly through . He also brought up a case where the technology helped authorities identify a disoriented woman with dementia who was wandering around a convenience store without an ID. “The process would have been a lot longer had they used fingerprinting that might not have worked, or waited for a missing persons report,” Ton-That told AARP. AARP NEWSLETTERS %{ newsLetterPromoText }% %{ description }% Subscribe AARP VALUE & MEMBER BENEFITS See more Health & Wellness offers > See more Flights & Vacation Packages offers > See more Finances offers > See more Health & Wellness offers > SAVE MONEY WITH THESE LIMITED-TIME OFFERS
Share:
0 comments

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Minimum 10 characters required

* All fields are required. Comments are moderated before appearing.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!