North Carolina Leads in Publicly Financed, Voter Owned, Candidate Camp...
State Leads Trend Toward Publicly Financed Campaigns
More candidates are discovering the benefits of not relying on special interests
As a state representative, pushed the General Assembly to publicly fund elections. He used the program himself two years ago while running for North Carolina insurance commissioner, and now he's sold on the idea. "It allowed me to spend 100 percent of my time meeting with voters … I think that's a good thing for voter and candidate alike," said Goodwin. Goodwin, a Democrat, and his Republican opponent, John Odom, both used the fledgling public finance program, which allowed them to meet and talk about the issues 22 times rather than go out and raise funds. Two other nonjudicial statewide candidates that year also used the program; one won and one lost. Five appellate court candidates in the Nov. 2 elections had , as of Aug. 31. North Carolina is one of only eight states to adopt voter-owned elections, also known as publicly funded elections. Opponents prefer to call these taxpayer-funded elections. Candidates can receive grants for their general election campaigns provided they: agree to a spending limit; stop fundraising after joining the program; and do not accept large donations from individuals, out-of-state donors and political committees. The began in 2004 for statewide appellate court races. It was expanded for three other statewide elective offices in 2008: superintendent of public instruction, insurance commissioner and state auditor. A commission is studying expanding the program to cover the state's treasurer, attorney general, secretary of state, and the commissioners of labor and agriculture. Supporters are hoping the idea becomes law in time for the 2012 elections. The publicly funded elections are designed to keep special interest and out-of-state money out of campaigns. Candidates qualify by raising a set amount of money — $30,000 in the insurance commissioner race — in small donations from hundreds of voters. Grant amounts vary depending on the average cost of the last three elections for each race. Goodwin's grant was $380,500. Candidates might also receive varying amounts of "rescue" funds. "Where that rescue option is most likely to be triggered is if there is a third party independent expenditure that is so large it has the potential for putting publicly financed candidates at a grave disadvantage," Goodwin said. The judicial program is funded largely by a $50 surcharge on the annual dues that attorneys pay to the . The three other statewide campaigns are funded with an appropriation from the , although the study commission is also looking at fees paid by state-regulated professions. Individuals can contribute to publicly financed elections with a $3 checkoff on their state income taxes. State Senate Minority Leader , a Republican from Eden, agrees the existing campaign finance system has problems. But he argues that more transparency in the way candidates raise and spend money is a better solution. "Any taxpayer-funded campaign act is one that, by definition, is going to use tax dollars," Berger said. "Saying it's an assessment against attorneys or insurance agents or folks that handle investments for the treasurer, that's a tax on a small segment of the population. You're forcing a taxpayer or citizen to pay money that will ultimately go toward candidates they don't support." Proponents argue that even if the funds all came out of the state general fund, it would be less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the budget, and it would be more than offset by cutting down on special interest legislation and tax loopholes that result from the current campaign finance system. Bill Wilson, advocacy director, said the benefits outweigh opposition to using tax money. "What people come to realize is that it takes special-interest money out of these races so people don't feel beholden to special interests," he said. Candidates are slowly realizing how much time they spend raising money rather than talking about issues, Wilson said. "Over time, as the demands for money become greater and greater, it's just going to get more attention and support." Sue Price Johnson is a freelance journalist based in Raleigh, N.C. Cancel You are leaving AARP.org and going to the website of our trusted provider. The provider’s terms, conditions and policies apply. Please return to AARP.org to learn more about other benefits. Your email address is now confirmed. You'll start receiving the latest news, benefits, events, and programs related to AARP's mission to empower people to choose how they live as they age. You can also by updating your account at anytime. You will be asked to register or log in. Cancel Offer Details Disclosures
Close In the next 24 hours, you will receive an email to confirm your subscription to receive emails related to AARP volunteering. Once you confirm that subscription, you will regularly receive communications related to AARP volunteering. In the meantime, please feel free to search for ways to make a difference in your community at Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.