Employees Score Victory on Workplace Wellness Rules

Employees Score Victory on Workplace Wellness Rules

Employees Score Victory on Workplace Wellness Rules Advocacy

Workers Score Court Victory on Workplace Wellness Rules

Many programs require employees to reveal private health data

Getty Images Employees who want to keep their medical and genetic information private got an important boost this week when a federal judge ruled against regulations that would impose a high price for not sharing that data with their employers. The regulations permitted companies to who choose not to share medical and genetic information with their workplace wellness program. While these programs have been promoted as ways to encourage healthier behavior, many employees are unwilling to share the highly personal information that is required to participate and could be used to discriminate against them on the job. U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled Tuesday against regulations issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that allow companies to charge penalties to workers who decline to participate in these programs. Those penalties could double or triple what the employee pays for health coverage. last October to block the rules. While the law requires that participation be voluntary, AARP argued that the rules effectively were coercive, forcing employees to decide between protecting their medical information and paying hundreds or even thousands of dollars more for their health insurance. Lisa Marsh Ryerson, president of AARP Foundation, said the ruling was “a tremendous victory for workers.” Given the risk of discrimination, “no one should be coerced into revealing personal health information in the workplace,” Ryerson said. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, employers are generally not allowed to ask their employees for personal and family health information on heart disease, cancer, diabetes, depression, bipolar disorder and other conditions. There is a narrow exception for programs, but only if they are voluntary. The judge found that the rules would take an especially hard toll on lower-income employees and were likely to “disproportionately affect people with disabilities.” The court said it would be too disruptive to discard the rules immediately, but it ordered the EEOC to “’ failings in a timely manner.” The EEOC has 30 days to tell the court its plan for fixing the problems with the rules.

Also of Interest

READ: READ: TAKE ACTION: DISCUSS: Cancel You are leaving AARP.org and going to the website of our trusted provider. The provider’s terms, conditions and policies apply. Please return to AARP.org to learn more about other benefits. Your email address is now confirmed. You'll start receiving the latest news, benefits, events, and programs related to AARP's mission to empower people to choose how they live as they age. You can also by updating your account at anytime. You will be asked to register or log in. Cancel Offer Details Disclosures

Close In the next 24 hours, you will receive an email to confirm your subscription to receive emails related to AARP volunteering. Once you confirm that subscription, you will regularly receive communications related to AARP volunteering. In the meantime, please feel free to search for ways to make a difference in your community at Javascript must be enabled to use this site. Please enable Javascript in your browser and try again.
Share:
0 comments

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Minimum 10 characters required

* All fields are required. Comments are moderated before appearing.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Employees Score Victory on Workplace Wellness Rules | Trend Now | Trend Now