Same Sex Marriage Tax Filing Issues

Same Sex Marriage Tax Filing Issues

Same Sex Marriage Tax Filing Issues - Bankrate Caret RightMain Menu Mortgage Mortgages Financing a home purchase Refinancing your existing loan Finding the right lender Additional Resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Bank Banking Compare Accounts Use calculators Get advice Bank reviews Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Credit Card Credit cards Compare by category Compare by credit needed Compare by issuer Get advice Looking for the perfect credit card? Narrow your search with CardMatch Caret RightMain Menu Loan Loans Personal Loans Student Loans Auto Loans Loan calculators Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Invest Investing Best of Brokerages and robo-advisors Learn the basics Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Home Equity Home equity Get the best rates Lender reviews Use calculators Knowledge base Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Loan Home Improvement Real estate Selling a home Buying a home Finding the right agent Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Insurance Insurance Car insurance Homeowners insurance Other insurance Company reviews Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Retirement Retirement Retirement plans & accounts Learn the basics Retirement calculators Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Advertiser Disclosure

Advertiser Disclosure

We are an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. Our goal is to help you make smarter financial decisions by providing you with interactive tools and financial calculators, publishing original and objective content, by enabling you to conduct research and compare information for free - so that you can make financial decisions with confidence.
Bankrate has partnerships with issuers including, but not limited to, American Express, Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, Citi and Discover.

How We Make Money

The offers that appear on this site are from companies that compensate us. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site, including, for example, the order in which they may appear within the listing categories. But this compensation does not influence the information we publish, or the reviews that you see on this site. We do not include the universe of companies or financial offers that may be available to you. SHARE: August 31, 2013 Kay Bell Bankrate logo

The Bankrate promise

At Bankrate we strive to help you make smarter financial decisions. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for how we make money. Bankrate logo

The Bankrate promise

Founded in 1976, Bankrate has a long track record of helping people make smart financial choices. We’ve maintained this reputation for over four decades by demystifying the financial decision-making process and giving people confidence in which actions to take next. Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. All of our content is authored by and edited by , who ensure everything we publish is objective, accurate and trustworthy. Our banking reporters and editors focus on the points consumers care about most — the best banks, latest rates, different types of accounts, money-saving tips and more — so you can feel confident as you’re managing your money. Bankrate logo

Editorial integrity

Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.

Key Principles

We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.

Editorial Independence

Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU – the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information. Bankrate logo

How we make money

You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey. Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers. We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money. Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and, services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service. Gay and lesbian couples got relationship equality with the June 26 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, is unconstitutional. Now that the law has been struck down, same-sex marriage is legal in the eyes of the federal government.

Jurisdictions that recognize same-sex marriages

California Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia* Iowa Maine* Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Washington *These jurisdictions also allow domestic partnerships. That means that same-sex married couples can, among other tax matters, now file joint tax returns. But as is often the case with taxes, such equality may work in their favor. Or it could make things worse. “From the perspective of tax equality, no one wants to pay more in taxes,” says CPA Nanette Lee Miller, partner in the San Francisco-based accounting firm Marcum LLP.” But with tax equality, everyone would be subject to the same rules.” Thirteen states and Washington, D.C., recognize the marriage of same-sex couples. California is now added to that list, after the high court’s dismissal of a separate same-sex marriage case, which was heard in March, the day before the DOMA arguments. On the federal level, however, DOMA had defined marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman. And that made a big difference in how some tax laws had been applied. Now, for better or worse, they will be applied more equitably. That was made official Aug. 29, when the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service announced that same-sex married couples, regardless of where they live, will be recognized as married for federal tax purposes. As long as the couple was legally married in a jurisdiction that sanctions the weddings, they are married in Uncle Sam’s tax eyes even if they later move to a state that does not recognize same-sex marriages.

Filing a federal return

Before the high court’s 5-4 decision, a legally married same-sex couple could not file a federal married-filing-jointly 1040 tax return or even a married-filing-separately 1040 tax return. These couples had to file two returns, with each partner sending the IRS a Form 1040 as a single taxpayer or, if children are part of the family, with one designated partner filing as a head-of-household taxpayer. Because the 10 percent and 15 percent federal income tax brackets for married joint filers are double that of single taxpayers, the filing differences don’t make that much difference to taxpayers whose total income falls in these lower brackets. This relatively recent change to tax law was made to ease the marriage tax penalty, which occurs when a couple filing jointly pays more than they would if the spouses each filed returns as single taxpayers.

Tax impact on $100 000 salary for different married couples

Tax due for heterosexual married couple filing jointly Tax due for same-sex married couple filing separate single returns Difference 100% income earned by one spouse $11,858 $19,585 $7,727 90% income earned by one spouse/10% by the other $11,858 $17,294 $5,436 80%/20% income split $11,858 $16,043 $4,185 70%/30% income split $11,858 $13,483 $1,625 60%/40% income split $11,858 $12,483 $625 50%/50% income split $11,858 $11,858 $0 Assumptions: household income of $100,000; couples take the standard deduction; 2013 tax rates; no children and no tax credits. Source: H&R Block. But once the income levels increase, the filing-status options and their tax effects are more pronounced. And when couples earn vastly different incomes, joint filing in some cases produces a combined income that receives better tax treatment. Same-sex couples, however, didn’t get to take advantage of this joint-filing benefit. Before the DOMA ruling, “If one partner makes more, there (was) no benefit of graduated tax rates,” says Miller. “There (was) no averaging of income where a couple would typically pay a lower tax rate if one makes substantially more than the other partner because the lower earnings of one spouse would pull the higher-earning partner’s income down.” Of course, it could work the other way. Now that DOMA is invalidated, some jointly filing same-sex married couples could face the same higher tax problem as their heterosexual counterparts. The marriage tax penalty tends to kick in when both partners earn roughly the same amount, especially if both are in the higher tax brackets. Before the Supreme Court changed the law, Miller advised her clients to run the numbers to determine whether they would pay more or less in taxes if DOMA was repealed. Now that same-sex couples will face the same federal filing status decisions as their heterosexual counterparts, they may need to run the numbers to see if it is more tax-advantageous to file jointly or as married filing separately. Since the court has deemed the law unconstitutional, CPA John J. Masselli says same-sex married couples should immediately amend any open tax years (generally those filed within the past three years) to file as married filing jointly for federal purposes. “Of course, I would only recommend this strategy if the outcome will result in a more beneficial tax outcome,” says Masselli, who also is a tax professor in the Texas Tech University Rawls College of Business.

Tax workload costs reduced

When DOMA was in effect, the federal law meant that same-sex couples had to do more work at tax time. And that usually translated to increased fees for tax preparation and advice. For a same-sex couple living in a state that has an income tax and that recognizes their marriage, they can file jointly in that state. This also is true if they are in states that recognize civil unions and registered domestic partnerships the same as marriages for tax purposes.

States with civil unions

States with only domestic partnerships

Same-sex couples in civil unions are granted state-level spousal rights. Colorado Hawaii* Illinois New Jersey Unmarried couples in domestic partnerships, including same-sex, are granted some or nearly all state-level spousal rights. Nevada Wisconsin Oregon *A civil union is a legal status created by several states and which provides legal protection to same-sex couples in the applicable states only. Civil unions typically are not recognized outside the couples’ state of legal residency. *Hawaii also allows domestic partnerships. A domestic partnership is a state-sanctioned legal status that allows unmarried couples, heterosexual and same-sex, to formalize their relationships and which extends some state rights to those couples. The IRS’ decision Aug. 29 to extend same-sex marriages the same federal tax-filing status treatment as heterosexual marriages regardless of where the couples live does not apply to registered domestic partnerships, civil unions or similar formal relationships recognized under state law. But because the Internal Revenue Service did not recognize that joint state filing, they had to do added work to complete their state returns. This was because most states use taxpayers’ federal returns as the basis for filing a state return. In order to have the correct numbers from a federal return to plug into a joint state return, same-sex couples had to fill out a fake federal Form 1040. That dummy federal joint return was used as the basis for their state taxes. That meant four returns: one joint state filing, a fake federal joint return and two single federal 1040s for each partner. If the couple uses a tax professional, that extra tax work meant additional costs for the taxpayers. The costs also went beyond just filing season. “Most heterosexual married couples feel protected by tax laws,” says Miller. But DOMA forced same-sex couples to be proactive. And that meant more planning and more professional fees in addition to the added tax considerations. Before DOMA was invalidated, for example, when an employee covered a same-sex spouse on workplace health insurance, it was a taxable event to the partner who provided the coverage. That’s an expense that heterosexual couples don’t face, since the spouse in a man-and-wife marriage is part of the federally tax-free family coverage. “That’s typically between $3,000 to $5,000 a year,” says Miller. “Some employers will gross it up to cover the tax, but others won’t, so you have to be prepared for the expense.” Companies that “gross up” employee compensation build the tax cost of the added income into the payment so that when taxes are accounted for, the worker still nets the full amount of the intended bonus or benefit. But if a workplace didn’t add the extra money to cover taxes, that was one more cost and added tax planning for same-sex husbands and wives whose marriages weren’t recognized by Uncle Sam. Now, however, that’s one tax matter that newly federally recognized same-sex couples don’t have to worry about. Related Links: Related Articles:
More On Same-sex Marriage And Taxes
SHARE: Kay Bell

Related Articles

Share:
0 comments

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Minimum 10 characters required

* All fields are required. Comments are moderated before appearing.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!