How To Prove IRS Wrong About A Tax Bill
How To Prove IRS Wrong About A Tax Bill Caret RightMain Menu Mortgage Mortgages Financing a home purchase Refinancing your existing loan Finding the right lender Additional Resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Bank Banking Compare Accounts Use calculators Get advice Bank reviews Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Credit Card Credit cards Compare by category Compare by credit needed Compare by issuer Get advice Looking for the perfect credit card? Narrow your search with CardMatch Caret RightMain Menu Loan Loans Personal Loans Student Loans Auto Loans Loan calculators Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Invest Investing Best of Brokerages and robo-advisors Learn the basics Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Home Equity Home equity Get the best rates Lender reviews Use calculators Knowledge base Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Loan Home Improvement Real estate Selling a home Buying a home Finding the right agent Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Insurance Insurance Car insurance Homeowners insurance Other insurance Company reviews Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Caret RightMain Menu Retirement Retirement Retirement plans & accounts Learn the basics Retirement calculators Additional resources Elevate your Bankrate experience Get insider access to our best financial tools and content Advertiser Disclosure
Bankrate has partnerships with issuers including, but not limited to, American Express, Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, Citi and Discover.
I had a charge-off that was apparently reported to the Internal Revenue Service in 2010. In April 2012 I paid back approximately half of this debt. In July 2012 I was informed that I owed the IRS extra tax for 2010 because of this income. I sent them a copy of the receipt to try and get the amount reduced by half, as half had since been paid; therefore it’s not income. They were not impressed and are still after me for the full amount. Will I be able to deduct the paid portion on my 2012 taxes? How can I resolve this tax bill dispute with the IRS?
— Ken
There are various defenses to fight this tax bill battle, but your best bet would be to hire an accountant to represent you so that you prevail in this matter. If I understand you right, you owed someone, let’s say, a bank, money that you did not repay in 2010. The bank charged this off as an uncollectible account and issued you a Form 1099. It sounds like you didn’t include this debt in your 2010 taxes and the IRS probably sent you a correspondence exam letter, known as a CP2000, asking why you didn’t record this as income. For some unknown reason you paid off half of this debt in 2012 and you believe that you shouldn’t have to pay tax in 2010 on this debt. I agree with you, the IRS is not seeing it right. Your defenses would be: Determine if you were insolvent in 2010 when the debt was forgiven. Usually, lenders only forgive debts when they believe they cannot collect, meaning they think you don’t have the assets to pay. If, in fact, your debts exceeded the value of your assets at the time the debt was forgiven, the law allows you to exclude the debt from income. If you repaid the loan in 2012, presumably the bank was still actively trying to collect from you. If this is the case, then the bank did not discharge the debt in 2010 and should retract the 1099. If the bank doesn’t retract the 1099, you may be able to convince the IRS that the 1099 was not issued in the right year as the bank continued collection efforts. If you can’t get anywhere with the correspondence unit, which is likely, do not agree to anything. The correspondence unit will issue what is known as a 30-day letter. This means you have 30 days to appeal the decision. Your appeal goes to the IRS Appeals office, which is a higher level of tax examiner that has more flexibility to apply the law fairly. Good luck and let me know how things turn out.
Advertiser Disclosure
We are an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. Our goal is to help you make smarter financial decisions by providing you with interactive tools and financial calculators, publishing original and objective content, by enabling you to conduct research and compare information for free - so that you can make financial decisions with confidence.Bankrate has partnerships with issuers including, but not limited to, American Express, Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, Citi and Discover.
How We Make Money
The offers that appear on this site are from companies that compensate us. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site, including, for example, the order in which they may appear within the listing categories. But this compensation does not influence the information we publish, or the reviews that you see on this site. We do not include the universe of companies or financial offers that may be available to you. SHARE: March 05, 2013 George Saenz Bankrate logoThe Bankrate promise
At Bankrate we strive to help you make smarter financial decisions. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for how we make money. Bankrate logoThe Bankrate promise
Founded in 1976, Bankrate has a long track record of helping people make smart financial choices. We’ve maintained this reputation for over four decades by demystifying the financial decision-making process and giving people confidence in which actions to take next. Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. All of our content is authored by and edited by , who ensure everything we publish is objective, accurate and trustworthy. Our banking reporters and editors focus on the points consumers care about most — the best banks, latest rates, different types of accounts, money-saving tips and more — so you can feel confident as you’re managing your money. Bankrate logoEditorial integrity
Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.Key Principles
We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.Editorial Independence
Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU – the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information. Bankrate logoHow we make money
You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey. Bankrate follows a strict , so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers. We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money. Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and, services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.I had a charge-off that was apparently reported to the Internal Revenue Service in 2010. In April 2012 I paid back approximately half of this debt. In July 2012 I was informed that I owed the IRS extra tax for 2010 because of this income. I sent them a copy of the receipt to try and get the amount reduced by half, as half had since been paid; therefore it’s not income. They were not impressed and are still after me for the full amount. Will I be able to deduct the paid portion on my 2012 taxes? How can I resolve this tax bill dispute with the IRS?
— Ken
More On Tax Bills
There are various defenses to fight this tax bill battle, but your best bet would be to hire an accountant to represent you so that you prevail in this matter. If I understand you right, you owed someone, let’s say, a bank, money that you did not repay in 2010. The bank charged this off as an uncollectible account and issued you a Form 1099. It sounds like you didn’t include this debt in your 2010 taxes and the IRS probably sent you a correspondence exam letter, known as a CP2000, asking why you didn’t record this as income. For some unknown reason you paid off half of this debt in 2012 and you believe that you shouldn’t have to pay tax in 2010 on this debt. I agree with you, the IRS is not seeing it right. Your defenses would be: Determine if you were insolvent in 2010 when the debt was forgiven. Usually, lenders only forgive debts when they believe they cannot collect, meaning they think you don’t have the assets to pay. If, in fact, your debts exceeded the value of your assets at the time the debt was forgiven, the law allows you to exclude the debt from income. If you repaid the loan in 2012, presumably the bank was still actively trying to collect from you. If this is the case, then the bank did not discharge the debt in 2010 and should retract the 1099. If the bank doesn’t retract the 1099, you may be able to convince the IRS that the 1099 was not issued in the right year as the bank continued collection efforts. If you can’t get anywhere with the correspondence unit, which is likely, do not agree to anything. The correspondence unit will issue what is known as a 30-day letter. This means you have 30 days to appeal the decision. Your appeal goes to the IRS Appeals office, which is a higher level of tax examiner that has more flexibility to apply the law fairly. Good luck and let me know how things turn out.