Quality Rater Guidelines Update More Focus on Quality - SISTRIX Login Free trialSISTRIX BlogFree ToolsAsk SISTRIXTutorialsWorkshopsAcademy Home / Blog / Quality Rater Guidelines Update More Focus on Quality

Quality Rater Guidelines Update More Focus on Quality

From: Steve Paine 29.07.2022Refinements in the definitions of quality, E.A.T and YMYL, a new overview document and indications that Google will detect “shocking or exaggerated titles.”ContentsContentsYour Money Your Life YMYL Low Quality PagesLowest Quality PagesAn SEO's optionSummary Search Quality Rater Guidelines are not directed at SEOs, but they contain a wealth of information that can be used to guide an SEO’s content strategy, and that makes them extremely important. The latest update was published on the 28th July 2022 and contains a number of important changes. We’ve included a summary below. Lily Ray has also written a more detailed post.

Your Money Your Life YMYL

Topics that Google considers having a potential impact in these areas are specifically addressed in the guidelines. Changes include a re-worded definition and a new list of categories. Google has also added a lookup chart to section 2.3 of the PDF, which addresses YMYL.

Low Quality Pages

What stands out in the update here is the reference to “Shocking or exaggerated titles” which are a valid reason for a low quality rating. The section is a must-read for all SEOs, giving clear tips about what a rater will look for in the Main Content (MC.) It references E-A-T too. Pages lacking Expertise, Authoritativeness, or Trustworthiness (E-A-T) may be marked as low quality pages and there’s a very strict guideline for raters: “No other considerations such as positive reputation or the type of website can overcome a lack of E-A-T for the topic or purpose of the page.”

Lowest Quality Pages

A new section re-itterates the statement above. Raters should not take into consideration any positive factors where there is a risk of harm to the reader from the content. Physical, mental, emotional,
financial harm along with violence, abuse, misinformation and deceptive purpose or design. Webspam is also included here, including hacked, defaced or spammed pages.

An SEO’ s option

I believe Google added significant changes and redacted information related to the definitions of YMYL and E-A-T because the previous version left these topics too open for interpretation. This version is much more clear and explicit about when content should be treated as YMYL and when E-A-T matters most for page quality.Lily Ray – Data journalist for SISTRIX

Summary

The Quality Rater Guidelines give SEOs an insight into Google’s vision for content that can rank well. Human raters will be using this information to feed information back to Google. A new and useful overview of the while process has been outlined in the Search Quality Raters Guidelines Overview. A more detailed look at the changes is available from Lily Ray. From: Steve Paine 29.07.2022Related posts Google: “There is no objectively correct way to count links” Links continue to be an important part of Google rankings, as Google sees them as external confirmation and recommendation... Johannes Beus28. July 2022 Google’s Quarterly Figures: Search solid, YouTube disappoints Google’s latest quarterly figures show concisely that after the Corona tailwind of recent years, turbulent times now... Johannes Beus28. July 2022 SectorWatch: Leading Domains and High Performance Content in the Ebikes Sector It’s time to get back in the saddle & start peddling (though not too hard) as this month SectorWatch takes a look at... Charlie Williams21. July 2022 German English Spanish Italian French