iPhone 14 sticks with a 60Hz display - and that s ridiculous Tom's Guide Skip to main content Tom's Guide is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's why you can trust us.

iPhone 14 sticks with a 60Hz display - and that s ridiculous

By Roland Moore-Colyer published 10 September 2022 This is the one reason I'd avoid the iPhone 14 (Image credit: Future) September's Apple event was full of slick production and a suite of eye-catching products... and the introduction of features for iPhones that Android phones have had for years. And I was fine with that, as the iPhone 14 Pro's always-on display is more capable than what Android phones offer. And the new Dynamic Island actually offers a dose of innovation for how a display cut-out can be turned into a feature rather than a distraction. But one thing left me cold: the iPhone 14. Don't get me wrong. The iPhone 14 has enough upgrades that have me suggesting you get it over the iPhone 13 that's now $100 cheaper. But the fact that in the year two-thousand-and-twenty-two Apple has given a $799 phone a 60Hz display is laughable. Actually, no it's insulting.

Hit me where it Hz

(Image credit: Future) Now, I've long been a fan of high refresh rate displays, having first jumped on the 90Hz bandwagon with the OnePlus 7 Pro. Granted, the upgrade from 60Hz to 90Hz wasn't huge but it was a noticeable difference in smoothness. I can understand Apple wanting to keep its 120Hz display as a Pro iPhone feature for one generation, but to continue it for two is deeply disappointing. The move to 120Hz was even more notable when coming from a 60Hz phone, making it very difficult to go back. This is one of the reasons I never used an iPhone 12 I had in for work as my main phone; as good as it was, the 60Hz display was just so jarring when compared to the smooth 120Hz of a Samsung Galaxy S21 or Oppo Find X3 Pro. I only made the move from Android to iPhone with the iPhone 13 Pro, which finally got a 120Hz LTPO ProMotion display and made iOS feel superbly slick. I can understand Apple wanting to keep its 120Hz display as a Pro iPhone feature for one generation, but to continue it for two is deeply disappointing. Sure, it could be argued it's a way to keep costs down and enables the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus to deliver impressive battery life. But I don't buy it when even mid-range to budget Android phones can stretch to a 90Hz panel at least. By not equipping the iPhone 14 with a 120Hz or even 90Hz display, I feel Apple is doing some form of pseudo-gatekeeping for phone technology. We know how popular iPhones are in the U.S., so Apple is effectively holding back tech for many Americans to enjoy unless they fork out for a $999 phone at a time when the cost of living is rocketing. I understand that the folks at Cupertino are not running a charity, but Apple touts itself as a driver of technology. So why not give its customers a high refresh rate display across the board? It's not like the standard iPhone 14 is super cheap anyway; the Samsung Galaxy S22 comes in at $799 and it offers a 120Hz display as well as a telephoto rear camera. Luckily, the adoption of high refresh rate displays has mostly penetrated the Android world, especially with the best Android phones, so in a way we don't need Apple to set a tech standard here for others to follow. But it's still frustrating when a company with such a vast reach saddles 50% of its new flagship phones with a 60Hz display. With all that in mind, if you were to ask me what new iPhone I would buy and what I'd recommend, I'd have to go with the iPhone 14 Pro. The likes of a 48-megapixel camera and new A16 Bionic chip are compelling upgrades, while the Dynamic Island really does seem like a feature that may actually be great to use. Of course, I'd suggest you wait for full Tom's Guide iPhone 14 reviews before making any buying decisions. Stay tuned. Next: Here's why our Phones Editor thinks Apple went overboard on the iPhone 14 Pro always-on display.Today's best Apple AirPods Pro dealsReduced Price (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)$249 (opens in new tab)$217.95 (opens in new tab)View Deal (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)$249 (opens in new tab)View Deal (opens in new tab)We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices

Be In the Know

Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Roland Moore-ColyerRoland Moore-Colyer a Managing Editor at Tom's Guide with a focus on news, features and opinion articles. He often writes about gaming, phones, laptops and other bits of hardware; he's also got an interest in cars. When not at his desk Roland can be found wandering around London, often with a look of curiosity on his face. More about smartphones iOS 16.1 launches today - here's the new features for your iPhone Google Pixel 7 vs. Pixel 6a camera face-off - is the Pixel 7 worth the extra money?Latest The 10 best Batman gamesSee more latest ► Topics Smartphones See all comments (0) No comments yet Comment from the forums MOST READMOST SHARED1The 10 best Batman games2Microsoft Surface Pro 9: Reasons to buy and skip 3iOS 16.1 launches today - here's the new features for your iPhone4Google Pixel 7 vs. Pixel 6a camera face-off - is the Pixel 7 worth the extra money?5Binge set to follow Netflix with new ad-supported tier in 20231The 10 best Batman games2Microsoft Surface Pro 9: Reasons to buy and skip 3iOS 16.1 launches today - here's the new features for your iPhone4Google Pixel 7 vs. Pixel 6a camera face-off - is the Pixel 7 worth the extra money?5Binge set to follow Netflix with new ad-supported tier in 2023